{"id":212,"date":"2017-01-10T14:31:10","date_gmt":"2017-01-10T14:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/?p=212"},"modified":"2017-05-17T01:39:09","modified_gmt":"2017-05-17T01:39:09","slug":"when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/","title":{"rendered":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"entry\">\n<p>\u201cWhat?!\u201d, you say.\u00a0 \u201c2+2=4 is an established mathematical fact.\u00a0 It cannot be wrong.\u201d\u00a0 Yes, 2+2=4 has lots of valid applications, such as counting toy blocks.\u00a0 It can even work for adding up vehicle trips on links.\u00a0 It does not work for standard deviations of independent random variables, where 2+2=2.828 (approximately).\u00a0 I am taking issue with researchers who cannot solve the problem needing solving, so they disregard inconvenient aspects of the problem and create a lot of perfectly fine mathematics that can cause incorrect forecasts.<\/p>\n<p>Rest assured, I have seen this issue many times in research by many different people.\u00a0 This is a broad cultural concern.<\/p>\n<p>First a disclaimer.\u00a0 I am not a mathematician.\u00a0 Some people think I am good at math, but I am really just a person who is often adept at applying other people\u2019s math to everyday planning problems.\u00a0 I am a tinkerer at heart.\u00a0 If I can get math to do what I want, I don\u2019t really care whether it has been proved conclusively.<\/p>\n<p>What does it matter if irrelevant research gets published?\u00a0 First, it creates clutter.\u00a0 Second, it validates incorrect thinking.\u00a0 Third, it devalues application-oriented research.\u00a0 Fourth and most importantly, it can lead practitioners astray.<\/p>\n<p>I not am going to accuse any person in particular (maybe you know who you are already), so my first example may be a bit abbreviated and hypothetical.\u00a0 Here, behavioral realism is paramount.<\/p>\n<p><em>First Example<\/em>.\u00a0 Let\u2019s take the case of travel time unreliability of paths within user equilibrium (UE) traffic assignments. There is a fairly substantial body of literature saying that the value of unreliability is related to the standard deviation of travel time.\u00a0 Now, the vast majority of this literature is composed of stated preference studies, which are always suspect, and we really don\u2019t know for sure what the functional form should look like in all cases.\u00a0 Nonetheless, the standard deviation assumption is about as good as we are going to be able to do for a while.<\/p>\n<p>Over the last few years I have seen multiple papers by multiple research teams proposing alternative functional forms, simply because standard deviations are not additive.\u00a0 Continuing the example, a researcher might choose to say that the value of unreliability is a constant fraction of link travel times. \u00a0(I am not aware of anyone doing this specifically, but I would not be surprised if somebody had actually done it.)\u00a0 An assumption like this has two powerful effects.\u00a0 First, it enables the researcher to prove convergence of the UE assignment with standard network theory.\u00a0 Second, it destroys any practical validity of the algorithm.\u00a0 A practitioner would get erroneous answers and a future researcher would be thrown off the track toward a behaviorally-correct method.<\/p>\n<p>New algorithms that violate well-established behavioral principles are hurtful.<\/p>\n<p><em>Another Example<\/em>.\u00a0 Perhaps you recall the decades-old debate over the error term in the utility equation within discrete choice theory.*\u00a0 The original derivation of the logit equation postulated that the error term was Gumbel distributed.\u00a0 The Gumbel distribution seemed like an odd pick to many, so other distributions were considered.\u00a0 The probit equation, which was based on the Gaussian distribution and had its advocates, was definitely more plausible but far more difficult to estimate.\u00a0 Importantly, logit came into practice ahead of probit.\u00a0 I cannot recall whether anybody at the time had convincing evidence as to whether probit was actually better than logit, behaviorally.\u00a0 We can pretty much agree that probit was more consistent with probability theory, but maybe not so dominatingly as to completely obsolete logit.\u00a0 We still see papers being published with logit equations at their core.<\/p>\n<p>For my part there are qualitative differences between these two examples.\u00a0 The logit\/probit debate was about statistical principles and the unreliability issue is about human behavior.\u00a0 I am willing to tolerate mathematical approximations that allow me to do my job, but I am not willing to tolerate mathematics that undermine our understanding of travel and traffic behavior.\u00a0 If travel forecasting is ever to become a true science we will need to protect what we know, build upon it and replace it when we can do better.<\/p>\n<p>As always, I would like to hear your opinion.<\/p>\n<p><em>Alan Horowitz, Whitefish Bay, January 10, 2017<\/em><\/p>\n<p>*See Boyce and Williams, <em>Forecasting Urban Travel<\/em>, for a technical history of this debate.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>\u201cWhat?!\u201d, you say.\u00a0 \u201c2+2=4 is an established mathematical fact.\u00a0 It cannot be wrong.\u201d\u00a0 Yes, 2+2=4 has lots of valid applications, such as counting toy blocks.\u00a0 It can even work for adding up vehicle trips on links.\u00a0 It does not work for standard deviations of independent random variables, where 2+2=2.828 (approximately).\u00a0 I am taking issue with &#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-212","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","category-research-philosophy","anons"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v27.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u201cWhat?!\u201d, you say.\u00a0 \u201c2+2=4 is an established mathematical fact.\u00a0 It cannot be wrong.\u201d\u00a0 Yes, 2+2=4 has lots of valid applications, such as counting toy blocks.\u00a0 It can even work for adding up vehicle trips on links.\u00a0 It does not work for standard deviations of independent random variables, where 2+2=2.828 (approximately).\u00a0 I am taking issue with ...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"QRS II Page\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"horowitz\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"horowitz\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"4 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"horowitz\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070\"},\"headline\":\"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research\",\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\"},\"wordCount\":722,\"commentCount\":0,\"articleSection\":[\"Research Philosophy\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\",\"name\":\"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/\",\"name\":\"QRS II Page\",\"description\":\"Information about the travel forecasting package, Quick Response System II\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070\",\"name\":\"horowitz\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"horowitz\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/author\/horowitz\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page","og_description":"\u201cWhat?!\u201d, you say.\u00a0 \u201c2+2=4 is an established mathematical fact.\u00a0 It cannot be wrong.\u201d\u00a0 Yes, 2+2=4 has lots of valid applications, such as counting toy blocks.\u00a0 It can even work for adding up vehicle trips on links.\u00a0 It does not work for standard deviations of independent random variables, where 2+2=2.828 (approximately).\u00a0 I am taking issue with ...","og_url":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/","og_site_name":"QRS II Page","article_published_time":"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00","article_modified_time":"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00","author":"horowitz","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"horowitz","Est. reading time":"4 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/"},"author":{"name":"horowitz","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070"},"headline":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research","datePublished":"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/"},"wordCount":722,"commentCount":0,"articleSection":["Research Philosophy"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/","url":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/","name":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research - QRS II Page","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2017-01-10T14:31:10+00:00","dateModified":"2017-05-17T01:39:09+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/2017\/01\/10\/when-224-is-wrong-the-case-against-irrelevant-travel-forecasting-research\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"When 2+2=4 is Wrong, the Case Against Irrelevant Travel Forecasting Research"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/","name":"QRS II Page","description":"Information about the travel forecasting package, Quick Response System II","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/#\/schema\/person\/b982087d07e1397f2767543367fb6070","name":"horowitz","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ef1125ea06cd56c8e360e1ff9c4eaf53600e7d1a0b3cc8dfa44a8bf78396e898?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"horowitz"},"url":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/author\/horowitz\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p8zKPW-3q","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=212"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":221,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/212\/revisions\/221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=212"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=212"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ajhassoc.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=212"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}